Caffeinated Ramblings Presents….

Latest Updates RSS

• 

  Vanessa 11:41 pm on March 31, 2007 | 8 | # |
  

  Hi!

  This is Nessa, and I’m here now too!

  Thanks, Mr. Mark. I will post many wonderful things for you, haha.

   
• 

  Chinky 7:40 pm on March 31, 2007 | 1 | # |
  Tags: beauty, cosmetic surgery, feminism, masculism, society

  I have here for you a little snipet from a masculist website. I haven’t decided how I feel about the website, but it’s not quite as chauvinistic as the URL leads you to believe. I don’t want you to have any bad first impressions so continue reading normally. You’ll get to the URL at the end of this entry.

  Every man should be warned, that even without surgery, the results of transformation by restyling hair, makeup and clothes, are frequently astonishing, and thus quite possibly what he is seeing in the apparently “glamorous” woman he has just met is in the genetic sense, not real.

  Thus a man who has a child to such a visually “remastered” woman, who appears beautiful to him, may well be shocked to see the child is very plain or average, by comparison.

  That is, all these techniques are really being used to deceive men.

  It is therefore suggested to men that they take the opportunity to see this girl or woman they are idolising without make up, with her hair up in a bun, so they can see the shape of her head and facial features properly, and in some kind of clothes and shoes that allow him to determine her true height and shape.

  It is further suggested that he see some old photographs of her, over a period of years previously, to be assured that what he is seeing is a “genetic reality.” If such old photographs, proceeding from even when she was a child, seem to be non-existent, or somehow “cannot be found”, this would seem to give genuine grounds for suspicion, as a typical attractive and therefore photogenic girl will usually have plenty.

  Does this kind of “secret service” mission seem unfair or harsh on the less photogenic and conventionally attractive girl?

  We do not think so, because the principle in life must be each to his own.

  That is, if society is properly organised, we will all find someone on our own level of intelligence and good looks to pair off with.

  But a woman who uses surgery to alter her genetic characteristics, is really deceiving a man, in making him think that she is a true beauty who will therefore produce beautiful children for him, when she likely won’t.

  A lady might argue however, that say she is relatively flat-chested, she would feel more confident with larger breasts.

  Apart from the dangers of this kind of surgery, many of which for all we know may still be unknown, an observation should be pointed out to women in general who would seek this route.

  Though not universally true, there seems to be a tendency for the more intelligent and higher, more refined classes of women – for example the aforementioned Audrey Hepburn – to be smaller in the chest.

  The kind of pendulous cartoon-like breasts we see on stars like Marilyn Monroe or many of the “page three” type girls (in the UK, there is a tradition of would-be celebrity girls posing topless on page three of certain national newspapers) seem to be frequently lacking in the more refined type of girl, especially one who is of a higher intelligence and sensitivity.

  We certainly do not see the Carry On movie, Barbara Windsor type chests on the few girls and women who make it to university professor stage very often, do we, unless they are generally overweight?

  It is further suggested to you that there may be an evolutionary basis for this.

  That is to say, that the more evolved women are becoming less animal, and this shows in that the seriously big hips and bosoms seem to be the definite prerogative of the lower classes of women in general.

  Whether or not this is true, which only a detailed and correctly oriented and executed research survey would show, what is certainly the case, is that if a man is in love with a woman, he will not be deterred by her lack of large bosom, because quite apart from anything else, large breasts tend to hypnotically attract the constant glances of other men, which though he may feel proud in the beginning of such attention, on the whole, in the long term he is not going to appreciate.

  It is also to say, that a girl without a stunningly beautiful face may need such a generous endowment to attract men at all, whereas the pretty girl, whose sharpness of face often reflects her sharpness of mind, doesn’t need anything more to attract a man, as for example flat chested nude scene actresses like Sylvia Kristel of Emanuelle fame proved amongst others.

  This also is why the deceit of major cosmetic surgery – i.e. that which restructures the whole face – seems to be an unacceptable fraud.

  We after all even recognise and judge others – their inner selves – by their faces, and so this kind of permanent “masquerade” these ladies are indulging in is really attempting to deceive us as to who and what they really are.

  Not only that, it is creating a paranoid competition amongst women themselves, “upping the ante” all the time, so that they are forced to battle one another by buying more and more “attributes” to tick as many of the boxes of desirability as possible, in their competition with other women for attention, jobs and men.

  With that, I guess it’s safe to post the URL now. It’s http://www.dumpyourwifenow.com/.
  The original article that the above was taken from is here.

  And for the record, I liked the article. I’m female.

  I’m also on the rag.

   
• 

  Mark Liebrecht 5:31 pm on March 31, 2007 | 4 | # |
  Tags: announcement, hellblog

  Over the past 24 hours, the following people have joined:

• Ian
• Mark #2
• Feena
• Goldy
• Scott
• Vanessa

Happy posting people!